26 July, 2018, by Alexia Chalita
In recent years, there has been a push for virtual clinical trials by big research organizations, including Novartis and Sanofi. In a virtual clinical trial, patients can interact with researchers via a device and reduce the number of onsite visits. The patient’s information is then sent directly to the researcher’s Electronic Data Capture (EDC) system in a seamless process. If the patient is due for drug administration or a follow up, a clinical trial personal can visit a patient’s home, or the patient can visit a local doctor’s office. Virtual clinical trials heavily reduce, or eliminate, onsite patient visits. This allows patients to continue with their daily activities, without heavy interruptions. For researchers, virtual clinical trials allow them to obtain patient data more seamlessly, shortening trial duration and improving patient retention, which could potentially save them millions of dollars per study.
How does this benefit companies sponsoring clinical trials?
Along with the incentives of shorter trials and increased patient retention, researchers face a constant struggle when recruiting patients for a study. About 80% of clinical trials fail to meet initial recruitment targets. With study recruits expected to attend around 11 onsite visits in six months, it is no surprise that only 2% of eligible candidates for clinical trials in the US actually participate. By introducing the option of virtual clinical trials, research organizations can reach more eligible candidates that would have previously been unable to join, like people living in remote areas or with mobility issues. This also helps bring in more diversity into a study by including underrepresented populations.
Like any new technological innovation, virtual clinical trials do come with limitations. Patients in clinical trials that require in-hospital attention are not candidates for remote monitoring. In addition, patients enrolled in a phase 1 clinical trial that require extensive patient observation, like during new drug treatment testing, should not be monitored virtually. These patients should be near a medical facility in case of any allergic reaction or emergency caused by the medication.
Nonetheless, virtual clinical trials are still an option for thousands of future clinical trials in the United States, and around the world. With big research organizations moving towards virtual clinical trials, it is safe to say they might be the future of clinical research. It can take decades for a new technology or process to be fully adopted in the clinical research industry, but big researchers are paving the way to turn virtual clinical trials into a new industry norm. With its incentives for both patients and research organizations, it is easy to see the appeal and potential of virtual clinical trials.
To allow a seamless data capture experience in your virtual trial, finding the right Electronic Data Capture vendor is crucial. We created a whitepaper, “A Data Manager’s Guide to EDC,” to help data managers and other decision makers learn more about what to look for and what questions to ask when shopping for a new Electronic Data Capture system. You can get your free copy today! Research onward towards the future, clinical researchers!
4 June, 2019
Getting Started With Electronic Data Capture in 2019With a wide-array of clinical research technology available, it can be difficult to determine the functionality and usefulness of a system for a particular study. In this blog, we will be briefly discussing one very important technology as it pertains to the role of Clinical Data Management (CDM): Electronic Data Capture. You can download the complete 2019 Guide to
6 May, 2019
The 510 (k) Pathway, Medical Device Safety and Real World EvidenceIf you work in clinical, and you have a Netflix account, you might have seen the recently released documentary “Bleeding Edge,” which spotlights the dangers that accompanies medical devices in America. It claims that America’s laid back approach to medi